luau-lang/rfcs
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/luau-lang/rfcs.git synced 2025-04-10 13:30:55 +01:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

remove accidental drawbacks

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
ffrostflame 2024-11-22 23:43:02 -05:00
parent 9a911a1455
commit 8b38904edc
1 changed files with 0 additions and 4 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
docs/do-not-change-init.luau-or-relative-require-semantics.md
View file

@ -16,10 +16,6 @@ There are a lot of projects which do rely on the current semantics, and changing
Do not change the behavior of requires when it comes to init.luau & relative requires.
## Drawbacks
The mismatch between the type of `...` in function declaration (`number`) and type declaration (`...number`) is a bit awkward. This also gets more complicated when we introduce generic variadic packs.
## Alternatives
Don't implement this RFC, and instead rely on the Luau maintainers to make the call. This is kind-of fine, because regardless of what the outcome is, the vast majority of Luau users are not using require-by-string.