luau-lang/rfcs
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/luau-lang/rfcs.git synced 2025-04-10 13:30:55 +01:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

Move bit about Roblox to motivation

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
ffrostflame 2024-11-22 23:42:11 -05:00
parent 10d29e97ec
commit 9a911a1455
1 changed files with 3 additions and 1 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
docs/do-not-change-init.luau-or-relative-require-semantics.md
View file

@ -10,6 +10,8 @@ There is currently a large amount of debate, and open RFCs, about changing requi
The current semantics are widely used, and similar to other languages with relative requires and an equivalent of `init.luau`. The current semantics also make sense, and they do not have any large issues.
There are a lot of projects which do rely on the current semantics, and changing them to conform to Roblox when the ultimate issue is down to "how do we express requiring children in Roblox" isn't great.
## Design
Do not change the behavior of requires when it comes to init.luau & relative requires.
@ -20,4 +22,4 @@ The mismatch between the type of `...` in function declaration (`number`) and ty
## Alternatives
Don't implement this RFC, and instead rely on the Luau maintainers to make the call. This is kind-of fine, because regardless of what the outcome is, the vast majority of Luau users are not using require-by-string. However there are a lot of projects which do rely on the current semantics, and changing them to conform to Roblox when the ultimate issue is down to "how do we express requiring children in Roblox" isn't great.
Don't implement this RFC, and instead rely on the Luau maintainers to make the call. This is kind-of fine, because regardless of what the outcome is, the vast majority of Luau users are not using require-by-string.