Test compile

tests/Compiler.test.cpp

@@ -1241,42 +1241,22 @@ TEST_CASE("InterpStringWithNoExpressions")
     CHECK_EQ(compileFunction0(R"(return "hello")"), compileFunction0("return `hello`"));
 }
 
-/**
- * INTERP CODE REVIEW: This test fails, but its not clear to me why.
- *
- * One reason is that LOP_MOVE is added indiscriminately with interpolated strings, whereas
- * standard namecalls only add it where necessary.
- * I am not sure how to fix that, but at least understand why it happens.
- *
- * The second reason, however, is that the registers are completely different for both.
- * Since the conformance tests pass, this might just be a difference without a distinction,
- * like if "format" is being registered before the other strings, for instance.
- *
- * (""):format() codegen:
- * LOADK R0 K0
- * LOADK R2 K1
- * NAMECALL R0 R0 K2
- * CALL R0 2 1
- * RETURN R0 0
- *
- * Interpolated string codegen:
- * LOADK R1 K0
- * LOADK R3 K1
- * NAMECALL R1 R1 K2
- * CALL R1 2 1
- * MOVE R0 R1
- * RETURN R0 0
- */
+TEST_CASE("InterpStringZeroCost")
+{
+    ScopedFastFlag sff{"LuauInterpolatedStringBaseSupport", true};
 
-// TEST_CASE("InterpStringZeroCost")
-// {
-//     ScopedFastFlag sff{"LuauInterpolatedStringBaseSupport", true};
-
-//     CHECK_EQ(
-//         "\n" + compileFunction0(R"(local _ = ("hello, %*!"):format("world"))"),
-//         "\n" + compileFunction0(R"(local _ = `hello, {"world"}!`)")
-//     );
-// }
+    CHECK_EQ(
+        "\n" + compileFunction0(R"(local _ = `hello, {"world"}!`)"),
+        R"(
+LOADK R1 K0
+LOADK R3 K1
+NAMECALL R1 R1 K2
+CALL R1 2 1
+MOVE R0 R1
+RETURN R0 0
+)"
+    );
+}
 
 TEST_CASE("InterpStringRegisterCleanup")
 {