diff --git a/docs/syntax-named-function-type-returns.md b/docs/syntax-named-function-type-returns.md
index 7becdde..b2ff865 100644
--- a/docs/syntax-named-function-type-returns.md
+++ b/docs/syntax-named-function-type-returns.md
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ local function x(): (return1: number, return2: number)
 
 This syntax is fully backwards compatible as only type names, generic names, or type packs are allowed in return position.
 
-Broadly, return names behave identically to parameter names.
+Return names are documentative - they are not identifiers that are usable in the function body.
 
 Function type comparisons will ignore the return names, this proposal doesn't change the semantics of the language and how typechecking is performed.
 
@@ -194,4 +194,4 @@ For a community project to implement support, they would need to discover all of
 
 There is a very real possibility that not implementing *any* standard way of annotating return type names will discourage people from documenting them at all, reducing the quality of documentation in the Luau ecosystem.
 
-The upshot is that Luau would remain unopinionated and free to ignore comments completely. We punt the problem to the community and all consumers of Luau, who will have to invent their own methods of documenting this info if it is desired.
\ No newline at end of file
+The upshot is that Luau would remain unopinionated and free to ignore comments completely. We punt the problem to the community and all consumers of Luau, who will have to invent their own methods of documenting this info if it is desired.