From 3dbfa9711ee756dedca90e627f8f4e320457dbe5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: gaymeowing <gaymeowing@noreply.github.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 09:08:19 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Inital commit

---
 user-side-subtype-checking-methods.md | 137 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 137 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 user-side-subtype-checking-methods.md

diff --git a/user-side-subtype-checking-methods.md b/user-side-subtype-checking-methods.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..446fe95
--- /dev/null
+++ b/user-side-subtype-checking-methods.md
@@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
+# Subtype Checking methods for User-Defined Type Functions
+
+## Summary
+
+New methods on the `type` userdata in type functions for performing subtype checks.
+
+## Motivation
+
+Currently there is no built in way to do subtype checks in User-Defined Type Functions. This means the developer has to write the following if they wanted to do a subtype check. Subtype checks are useful for type functions, because it makes code like in the following 2 example cases unneeded.
+
+Case 1: Checking if a type is a string or a string singleton
+```luau
+local is_string = t:is("string") or (t:is("singleton") and type(t:value()) == "string")
+```
+
+Case 2: Checking if a type is an enum
+```luau
+type function isenum(t)
+    if t:is("union") then
+        local components = t:components()
+        local components_that_are_string = 0
+
+        for _, component in components do
+            if tv:is("string") or (tv:is("singleton") and type(tv:value()) == "string") then
+                components_that_are_string += 1
+            end
+        end
+        return types.singleton(
+            components_that_are_string == #components
+        )
+    else
+        return types.singleton(false)
+    end
+end
+```
+
+Additionally it would be a pain for users to write a type function to be able to do subtype checks for any type. As the following example type function is already very long, despite not covering everything.
+
+```luau
+type function hassubtypeof(a, b)
+    local false_type = types.singleton(false)
+    local true_type = types.singleton(true)
+    local is_subtype = false
+    local a_tag = a.tag
+    local b_tag = b.tag
+
+    if 
+        (a_tag == b_tag) or
+        (b_tag == "singleton" and type(b:value()) == a_tag) or
+        (b_tag == "negation" and type(b:inner()) == a_tag)
+    then
+        is_subtype = true
+    elseif b_tag == "union" or b_tag == "intersection" then
+        local components = b:components()
+        local conmponents_that_are_subtype = 0
+
+        for _, component in components do
+            if hassubtypeof(component):value() then
+                conmponents_that_are_subtype += 1
+            end
+        end
+
+        return types.singleton(#components == conmponents_that_are_subtype)
+    elseif b_tag == "table" and a_tag == "table" then
+        local b_mt = b:metatable()
+        local a_mt = a:metatable()
+
+        if b_mt == a_mt then
+            return true_type
+        elseif b_mt and a_mt then
+            local b_mts = { b_mt }
+            local next_b_mt
+            local next_a_mt = a_mt
+
+            while next_b_mt do
+                table.insert(b_mts, next_b_mt)
+                next_b_mt = next_b_mt:metatable()
+            end
+
+            while next_a_mt do
+                for _, mt in b_mts do
+                    if mt == next_a_mt then
+                        return true_type
+                    end
+                end
+                next_a_mt = next_a_mt:metatable()
+            end
+        else
+            --[[
+                For the purposes of this rfc, my point has already been made. And I do not want to write the rest of this type function that nobody should ever use,
+                as its probably going to be an easy way to hit the type function time limit.
+            --]]
+        end
+    end
+
+    return types.singleton(is_subtype)
+end
+```
+
+## Design
+
+This RFC proposes adding 4 new methods to the [`type`](./user-defined-type-functions.md#type-instance) userdata in type functions.
+
+### New Methods
+
+| Name | Return Type | Description |
+| ------------- | ------------- | ------------- |
+| `hassubtype(arg: string)` | `boolean` | returns true if self has a subtype of the same tag as the argument. List of available tags: "nil", "unknown", "never", "any", "boolean", "number", "string", "singleton", "negation", "union", "intersection", "table", "function", "class" |
+| `hassubtypeof(arg: type)` | `boolean` | returns true if self has a subtype of the argument. |
+| `hasonlysubtype(arg: string)` | `boolean` | returns true if self has only a subtype of the same tag as the argument. List of available tags: "nil", "unknown", "never", "any", "boolean", "number", "string", "singleton", "negation", "union", "intersection", "table", "function", "class" |
+| `hasonlysubtypeof(arg: type)` | `boolean` | returns true if self has a subtype of the argument. |
+
+The `only` methods are diffrent with how they validate, as shown below.
+
+Example 1:
+```luau
+type meow = number | "mrrp" | string
+
+print(meow:hasonlysubtypeof(types.string)) -- false, because theres a number in the union.
+print(meow:hassubtypeof(types.string)) -- true, because even though theres a number, theres also types with a subtype of string, and also string itself.
+```
+
+Example 2:
+```luau
+type mrow = "purr" | "meow"
+
+print(meow:hasonlysubtypeof(types.string)) -- true, because despite the union being made up of singletons. Those singletons have the subtype of string, so it returns true.
+print(meow:hassubtypeof(types.string)) -- true
+```
+
+## Drawbacks
+
+Adds extra methods to the type userdata in User-Defined type functions.
+
+## Alternatives
+
+Do nothing, and let users write the checks themselves as it is currently.
\ No newline at end of file