From 341af0d619a1a8dadd56ed95c501c7dfcd51fae1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: T045TN1NJ4 <toastninja@pm.me>
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2025 15:17:51 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Update explicit-accuracy-for-math-round.md

---
 docs/explicit-accuracy-for-math-round.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/docs/explicit-accuracy-for-math-round.md b/docs/explicit-accuracy-for-math-round.md
index df037cb..9356435 100644
--- a/docs/explicit-accuracy-for-math-round.md
+++ b/docs/explicit-accuracy-for-math-round.md
@@ -46,4 +46,4 @@ print( math.todec(3.1415, 2) ) -- Output: 3.14
 ```
 The problem with this approach is that it's a rather unnecessary cluttering of the `math` library, especially in comparison to the proposed, much simpler solution. While they both achieve the same thing, this approach feels like it 'takes up too much space'.
 
-Another alternative could be to continue doing nothing. My only argument against not changing is that I think there's nothing to lose by making the change, however, I recognize that that's largely my personal bias, and that it may also be, in some ways and to some extent, an uneducated take.
+Another alternative could be to continue doing nothing. My only rebuttal is that I think there's nothing to lose by making this change, however, I recognize that that's largely my personal bias, and that it may also be, in some ways and to some extent, an uneducated take.