mirror of
https://github.com/luau-lang/rfcs.git
synced 2025-04-10 13:30:55 +01:00
punctuated buffer-swap-rfc.md
This commit is contained in:
parent
03f6e4e1dc
commit
2f56c59068
1 changed files with 5 additions and 5 deletions
|
@ -2,11 +2,11 @@
|
|||
|
||||
## Summary
|
||||
|
||||
`buffer.swap(b, x, y, range?)` swaps a variable `range(?=1)` of bytes stored at offsets `x` and `y` of buffer `b`
|
||||
`buffer.swap(b, x, y, range?)` swaps a variable `range(?=1)` of bytes stored at offsets `x` and `y` of buffer `b`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Motivation
|
||||
|
||||
The absence of a byte-range-swap function implies that for any variable range of bytes that need to be swapped, these bytes would have to be normalized as strings (see *Design*), *then* written back into the buffer. Although the implementation works, it would make more sense to have a buffer function that interally manipulates the desired offsets/range of bytes instead of the provided method where the byte ranges are interpreted as strings to achieve the same result
|
||||
The absence of a byte-range-swap function implies that for any variable range of bytes that need to be swapped, these bytes would have to be normalized as strings (see *Design*), *then* written back into the buffer. Although the implementation works, it would make more sense to have a buffer function that interally manipulates the desired offsets/range of bytes instead of the provided method where the byte ranges are interpreted as strings to achieve the same result.
|
||||
|
||||
In short, the current swap implementation has a string "layer" (unneccessary complexity/operations/conversions? (conjecture)), whereas the proposal for `buffer.swap( ... )` internally manipulates the byte ranges without any string interpretations etc.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -35,10 +35,10 @@ print(buffer.readf32(b, 4)) --- 3.14... is now at 4
|
|||
|
||||
## Drawbacks
|
||||
|
||||
Real use-cases may be sparse, where this rfc could be interpreted as having added bloat to the buffer library
|
||||
Real use-cases may be sparse, where this rfc could be interpreted as having added bloat to the buffer library.
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives
|
||||
|
||||
`is:pr is:open buffer.swap` search query on `/luau-lang/rfcs/pulls` returns no results
|
||||
`is:pr is:open buffer.swap` search query on `/luau-lang/rfcs/pulls` returns no results.
|
||||
|
||||
`buffer.swap[u/i/f/string/...][8/16/32/64/...](b, x, y, range?)` (a case for each buffer type) was initially considered but that would very quickly become a nightmare for managing code. The provided working implementation is shown because (despite normalizing bytes as strings) it most-closely represents the goal of this rfc
|
||||
`buffer.swap[u/i/f/string/...][8/16/32/64/...](b, x, y, range?)` (a case for each buffer type) was initially considered but that would very quickly become a nightmare for managing code. The provided working implementation is shown because (despite normalizing bytes as strings) it most-closely represents the goal of this rfc.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue