From cf0bc1ed933af0d1623b9f06aafe04e88cc1daff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: James Napora <85808999+TheGreatSageEqualToHeaven@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2022 16:53:03 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] Update syntax-list-comprehensions.md --- rfcs/syntax-list-comprehensions.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/rfcs/syntax-list-comprehensions.md b/rfcs/syntax-list-comprehensions.md index 3a09a4b4..7a8ccb7d 100644 --- a/rfcs/syntax-list-comprehensions.md +++ b/rfcs/syntax-list-comprehensions.md @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ When traversing a table to exclude all the odd numbers you'd be creating a large To solve these problems, I propose a `n for-in-do` expression form that is syntactically similar to a for statement, but lacks terminating `end`. The `n for-in-do` expression must match `` for in do``. -A ``if then`` expression might be required. +A ``if `` expression might be required. Example: ```lua