mirror of
https://github.com/CompeyDev/blog.devcomp.xyz.git
synced 2024-12-12 12:50:41 +00:00
Fix speed clarification for lune vs bun
This commit is contained in:
parent
507875de44
commit
88b5366c92
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
|
@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ There’s been a lot of talk about [Bun](https://bun.sh), a fast and modern Java
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
![lune crypto benchmark](./lune_bench.png "A benchmark of a SHA-256 implementation in Lune and Bun")
|
![lune crypto benchmark](./lune_bench.png "A benchmark of a SHA-256 implementation in Lune and Bun")
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
For the Luau script, I’m using [Lune](https://github.com/lune-org/lune) as the runtime (Lune is similar to what Node accomplishes for JavaScript, it’s a script runtime with a well-designed standard library of APIs and other features) and [luau-hashing](https://github.com/dekkonot/luau-hashing) for the SHA-256 implementation. For Bun, I’m using their native crypto APIs. Lune is faster than Bun by **5 orders of magnitude**, and the benchmark is rigged against Lune, since we’re comparing a pure Luau implementation to a native zig API.
|
For the Luau script, I’m using [Lune](https://github.com/lune-org/lune) as the runtime (Lune is similar to what Node accomplishes for JavaScript, it’s a script runtime with a well-designed standard library of APIs and other features) and [luau-hashing](https://github.com/dekkonot/luau-hashing) for the SHA-256 implementation. For Bun, I’m using their native crypto APIs. Lune is **5 times faster** than Bun, and the benchmark is rigged against Lune, since we’re comparing a pure Luau implementation to a native zig API.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The [Lynx](https://lynx.land) web framework for Lune is **3 times faster** than Express on Node.
|
The [Lynx](https://lynx.land) web framework for Lune is **3 times faster** than Express on Node.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue