DevComp/blog.devcomp.xyz
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/CompeyDev/blog.devcomp.xyz.git synced 2024-12-12 04:40:41 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Fix speed clarification for lune vs bun

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Erica Marigold 2024-07-06 17:33:03 +05:30
parent 507875de44
commit 88b5366c92
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 2768CC0C23D245D1
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
src/content/posts/luau-for-js-devs/index.md
View file

@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ There’s been a lot of talk about [Bun](https://bun.sh), a fast and modern Java
![lune crypto benchmark](./lune_bench.png "A benchmark of a SHA-256 implementation in Lune and Bun")
For the Luau script, I’m using [Lune](https://github.com/lune-org/lune) as the runtime (Lune is similar to what Node accomplishes for JavaScript, it’s a script runtime with a well-designed standard library of APIs and other features) and [luau-hashing](https://github.com/dekkonot/luau-hashing) for the SHA-256 implementation. For Bun, I’m using their native crypto APIs. Lune is faster than Bun by **5 orders of magnitude**, and the benchmark is rigged against Lune, since we’re comparing a pure Luau implementation to a native zig API.
For the Luau script, I’m using [Lune](https://github.com/lune-org/lune) as the runtime (Lune is similar to what Node accomplishes for JavaScript, it’s a script runtime with a well-designed standard library of APIs and other features) and [luau-hashing](https://github.com/dekkonot/luau-hashing) for the SHA-256 implementation. For Bun, I’m using their native crypto APIs. Lune is **5 times faster** than Bun, and the benchmark is rigged against Lune, since we’re comparing a pure Luau implementation to a native zig API.
The [Lynx](https://lynx.land) web framework for Lune is **3 times faster** than Express on Node.